Why choose to automate quality first NOT volume?

The rise of use of automated systems within the manufacturing sector, and beyond, encompasses robots, automated design systems, automated quality check systems, finance systems, analysis systems, automated testing systems, training systems, automated control systems and personnel update systems among others.

While some media has tried to stir up discomfort against the Brave New World concepts or the "Rise of the Machine", the truth is actually more interesting:

The Truth About Job Security

The key concern for those whose jobs are at threat from such equipment, should not be concerned for themselves if their company operates wisely.

It is a truism to say that if a company is not growing, then it is dying.

So, if the company is growing, it can automate and still use all its staff – maybe not in the same roles, but certainly often using the same background training and knowledge of the subject. Thus, automation does ring the changes for those staff impacted – but only to affect what they do in their role rather than losing that role altogether.

And this is a good thing: any organisation should want to retain the experience built up over years – what works best, what causes what problems, what was done last time something was demanded that was not normal etc.

So increased automation does allow an organisation to remove staff by substituting machines instead, but any organisation that does this, risks losing far more than it gains in the longer term.

The Productivity Advantage

Additionally, automation improves on productivity – that oh so elusive factor that companies ought to be seeking at (almost) any cost. Enhanced productivity comes from the improvement in quality control combined with the increased processing speed – ie a higher output, more reliably finished, utilising fewer human hours.

Automation should also generate higher returns on capital invested (or why install it in the first place?).

As a combined result, the organisation will have a team of staff with high morale and strong loyalty (because the organisation has kept them on and trained them further) in parallel with enhanced profits and improved corporate image (higher quality and larger slice of the market).

Quality First, Volume Second

So, which is the 'right' automation process – and what should you get first?

Simply put, the best automation systems are those that enhance the quality of the outputs while maintaining or, ideally, enhancing the scale of those outputs.

Remember that extra production at the same quality level is not much of a benefit on its own.

Without the enhanced quality of the process, the extra production will still require more inputs, will generate more wastes, will boost the number of employees needed and will not generate the additional revenue necessarily to pay for itself.

Why Quality First?

• You can charge more for the output as it is now a higher quality
• You pay less per unit to produce it as there will be less wastage
• Even with the same price charged and even in a highly competitive market, buyers will seek the higher quality unit ahead of the others

Then, once the quality issues are addressed and opportunities maximised in that area, the automated systems relating to increasing volume output can be installed – but if the market is highly competitive then there may not be a demand for the extra output so that needs to be checked first.

What Systems Focus on Quality?

So what automated systems focus first on quality? Anything that:

This means that whereas in the past, previously paper systems such as ISO standards, or 6 Sigma or the like were involved, the automation available nowadays allows this sort of thing to be enacted alongside self-testing processes that alert people as required.

The systems can be used to train staff with minimal bureaucracy, to assess morale and enthusiasm far better than the historic questionnaires (that everyone faked) and to ensure that calibrations, tests and follow up actions all take place ensuring that ideas are truly enacted.